© 2000 Jonathan Bernstein
SPECIAL POST-ELECTION ISSUE
After wrestling with myself, an exhausting process, I lost two falls out of three to my Inner Humorist, who insisted on devoting this issue to an
allegorical case history which is best read aloud, and not at mealtime.
If this is your first issue of Crisis Manager, PLEASE be assured that it's nothing like my typical newsletters. OK, well, maybe it's SOMETHING
like my typical newsletters in the sense of showcasing my cheek-embedded tongue. But I'm usually more serious, truly.
Then again, maybe I still am.
My best to all, with continued thanks for your subscription.
Publisher & Editor
(Editor's Note: This was received by satellite from an anonymous source to be identified further herein.)
The Great Confusion: An Allegory of Issues Management
On Epluribusunum, a planet circling a star in a galaxy far, far away, democracy ruled. The central government of the planet had representatives
from every nation-state, but some nation-states had more representatives than others because they were more populous. Similarly, the world's highest
official -- The Principal Peter -- was elected based on a system which allocated a certain number of votes to each nation-state. If a candidate won
the popular vote in his or her nation-state, all of that sovereign territory's vote allocation went to that candidate. Great believers in honest labeling, the
people called the electoral system "The Great Confusion."
For many years, The Great Confusion had, usually with minimal muss and fuss, sent representative after representative, Principal Peter after Principal
Peter, to the world's capitol city, BlackHole. There were hundreds of short-term challenges to the system over the decades, but all of them were
remanded to the Court of Apathy, the nation's highest and most powerful decision-making body, from whence they never again emerged.
In the year of this case history, however, something odd happened. While the election of representatives went pretty much as usual, the battle for the
Principal Petership was fierce and ineffable. One candidate, Whoami Now, garnered the most popular votes of the combined nation-states. But the
other candidate, Shal-O Goodoldboy, appeared to have won the most total nation-state votes, the core of The Great Confusion. There was, however, a glitch.
In Flatland, a heavily populated nation-state known best for its many varieties of poisonous and carnivorous reptiles, local officials had decided
to enhance The Great Confusion by using different voting systems and ballots from district to district. Additionally, they granted great discretion on
interpretation of voting rules to individuals whose education on the subject was roughly equal to the training given Epluribusunumites about how to fly
without the aid of a machine, and whose compensation was largely in the form of indeterminate ego-gratification and all the liquid stimulant they could drink.
Incredibly, miraculously, strangely, tragically, the Flatland system -- and systems like it in most of the nation-states -- had operated unchallenged and
uncontroversial for lo all these years. This time, however, Flatland's collective votes for Principal Peter would apparently swing the election to
the candidate who won the nation-state's popular election. And no one knew who that really was because, faced with that reality, but with Whoami
Now trailing in the vote count, his supporters launched an all-out legal and public relations battle to somehow amend the system, retroactively, in a manner which benefited their candidate. Immediately, Shal-O
Goodoldboy's fans and staff launched a counter-offensive. The largest historical gathering of another powerful institution, the Court of Public Opinion, was in session worldwide.
Issues/Crisis Management Tactics Employed
Experts in the law - known as StirShys because of their mandatory graduation from the special university located in the city of StirShy, part of
the nation-state of Loophole -- had, of course, their own methods of challenging the system. This case history focuses primarily on the tactics
employed by Epluribusunum's Public Relations Crisis Communicators, or PRCCs. To wit (at least half-way):
PRCCs detected, investigated, created, exaggerated and enunciated every possible detail which could, even remotely, suggest that opposition PRCCs viewpoints were invalid.
Self-appointed PRCCs, including many local, nation-state and national elected officials, added their opinions and observations to the mix. In fact, some became PRCCs just to have a chance to get
some visibility, even though the issues had nothing to do with them, believing that "any publicity is good publicity."
PRCCs invaded the Court of Apathy and incited mobs of normally unconscious citizens to protest issues which most couldn't have
explained even if enticed by an offer of free facelifts, a best-seller in Flatland.
In one of the most bizarre partnerships in the planet's history, The Hack Guild -- which operated the print and broadcast media of Epluribusunum --
COMPLETELY bought into, complimented, reinforced, endorsed and amplified the tactics employed by every PRCC in the world. It was rumored that they reversed their normal antipathy towards cooperating with
professional PRCCs on the advice of a guru known as the Prophet Motive.
Unfortunately, the PRCC who clandestinely sent me this case history from Epluribusunum had his transmission cut a little short, and I cannot say who
eventually won the position of Principal Peter. You may not believe this, but the incredible resources devoted to both creating and attempting to resolve
this challenge were all done just so that the winning party could take office for four years and, in fact, wield little direct power. I know, you would think
he would be elected for a decade, or a lifetime, given how hotly the PRCCs, StirShys and others waged war with The Great Confusion and its Flatland incarnation.
Some other results, however, included:
Virtual assurance that neither candidate would be able to run for office again.
A complete undermining of public confidence in The Great Confusion.
MUCH higher public awareness of just how many PRCCs, professional and self-appointed, there were in the world.
Record sales of print ads and broadcast air time.
How COULD this have turned out, if the right PRCC, at the right time and place, had acted a little differently?
Let's say that Whoami Now's chief PRCC, Meister Spin, had advised his candidate -- once it became clear that the process was going to get bogged
down in both the Courts of Law and the Court of Public Opinion - to use the situation as an opportunity to overcome any remaining negative
perceptions the public had about the politician. An opportunity to manage four years of public opinion about Shal-O Goodoldboy. And an opportunity to be elected Principal Peter, after that four-year delay, by a
huge mandate instead of a legal technicality.
Meister Spin, in this hypothetical situation, could have recommended that Whoami Now:
Gracefully concede defeat to Shal-O Goodoldboy.
Call for representatives and PRCCs of Whoami's political persuasion to cease any public outcry immediately.
Announce the creation of the Election Normalization Uniformity Foundation (ENUF), a nonprofit think tank devoted to standardizing and reforming the electoral system. ENUF would include "the
common citizen" as well as those typically involved in politics, and have a firm goal of achieving a workable system in two years.
Leave it to the Hack Guild to keep a heavy focus on every move the new Principal Peter makes, complete with sly innuendos about how it might have been different if Whoami won.
Proudly comment on the progress of ENUF, while keeping hands off so as not to be accused of manipulation.
Target certain key media and influence groups to whom Whoami could give interviews or make speeches in the years between elections, always tactfully offering opinions on how he might have
handled any issue with which Shal-O was struggling. The not-so-hidden message, of course, being "I could have done this better."
Suggest that his loyalists follow a similar pattern of tasteful, but tactical, behavior to help ensure that they become the overwhelming majority government when Whoami is elected.
And who knows? Maybe that's exactly what happened. Or maybe Shal-O's advisors came up with a similar plan rather than suffer the
ignominy of having their victory overturned by the courts? We may never know what happened on Epluribusunum, but perhaps some of us can learn from it, regardless.
(Editor's Note: OK, now I become a risk-taker. Did you like the article? If you did and have friends in the media who might enjoy or
reprint it, please pass it on. If you'd like me to periodically stray from more traditional case histories to write more like this one, let me know. And if you hated it you'll send me very diplomatic comments
rather than cancelling your subscription, yes? As always, you can reach me by sending email to firstname.lastname@example.org.)
"Crisis Manager" now has more than 1,000 subscribers and a high "pass along" readership. It is also reprinted by a number of PR firms for
redistribution to their clients. We will accept tasteful advertising from firms whose credentials will first be investigated. We are starting to look at the
possibility of long-term sponsors for the newsletter. We also accept short text-based ads in the newsletter and on the website. Research demonstrates that readers click through from text much quicker than from
banners, and text-based referrals are higher quality leads. Ad rates and specs available on request -- if interested, write to email@example.com.
(Have a newsletter and/or website and want to exchange links? Let's talk about it! Write to firstname.lastname@example.org.)
These sites have proven valuable to my business and may do the same for yours.
About.com - Public Relations is a one-stop resource for public relations, corporate and marketing communications, and business people with 24
subject categories and more than 1200 direct links to content for PR & communications professionals plus chat, newsletter and more. Go to http://publicrelations.about.com.
"Media Insider" is a free service for the public relations community hosted by PR Newswire and ProfNet, its online resource linking reporters with
expert sources. Updated daily with contributions from members, Insider reports on the people and new technologies behind the production of news. Go to http://www.mediainsider.com.
The PR Network provides a means for exchanging ideas and business improvement tips between PR professionals. They're at http://www.theprnetwork.com and their newsletter can be subscribed to by
sending email to email@example.com with the word "subscribe" in the BODY of the email.
All information contained herein is obtained by Jonathan Bernstein from sources believed by Jonathan Bernstein to be accurate and reliable.
Because of the possibility of human and mechanical error as well as other factors, neither Jonathan Bernstein nor Bernstein Crisis Management is responsible for any errors or omissions. All information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Bernstein Crisis Management and Jonathan Bernstein make no representations and disclaim all express, implied, and statutory warranties of any kind to the user and/or any third party including, without limitation, warranties as to accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability, or fitness for any particular purpose.
Unless due to willful tortuous misconduct or gross negligence, Jonathan Bernstein and Bernstein Crisis Management shall have no liability in tort, contract, or otherwise (and as permitted by law, product liability), to the user and/or any third party.
Under no circumstance shall Bernstein Crisis Management or Jonathan Bernstein be liable to the user and/or any third party for any lost profits or lost opportunity, indirect, special, consequential, incidental, or punitive damages whatsoever, even if Bernstein Crisis Management or Jonathan Bernstein has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
A service of this newsletter is to provide news summaries and/or snippets to readers. In such instances articles and/or snippets will be reprinted as they are received from the originating party or as they are displayed on the originating website or in the original article. As we do not write the news, we merely point readers to it, under no circumstance shall Bernstein Crisis Management or Jonathan Bernstein be liable to the user and/or any third party for any lost profits or lost opportunity, indirect, special, consequential, incidental, or punitive damages whatsoever due to the distribution of said news articles or snippets that lead readers to a full article on a news service's website, even if Bernstein Crisis Management or Jonathan Bernstein has been advised of the possibility of such damages. Authors of the original news story and their publications shall be exclusively held liable. Any corrections to news stories are not mandatory and shall be printed at the discretion of the list moderator after evaluation on a case-by-case basis.
OTHER IMPORTANT STUFF
Crisis Manager and the Bernstein Crisis Management website will now periodically include book, software and related product/service reviews. To suggest items for review, write to firstname.lastname@example.org or contact Jonathan Bernstein, Bernstein Crisis Management, 1013 Orange Avenue, Monrovia, CA 91016, (626) 825-3838.
Unless otherwise indicated, all material herein is written by Jonathan Bernstein. If you have questions for "Crisis Manager on the Spot" or comments about other topics, you can contact him at: email@example.com.
Do you know people who are Crisis Managers, whether they want to be or not? Please pass this newsletter on to them!
Subscribe to the free, twice-monthly email newsletter below. After entering your email address, you will receive a message asking you to confirm your subscription in order to prevent someone else from adding you to the list without permission. YOU MUST CONFIRM YOUR SUBSCRIPTION OR YOU WILL NOT RECEIVE THE NEWSLETTER.
Articles in "Crisis Manager" were, unless otherwise noted, written and copyrighted by Jonathan Bernstein. Permission to reprint will often be granted for no charge. Write to firstname.lastname@example.org.