Bernstein Crisis Management. Crisis response, prevention, planning, and training.

Crisis Manager Internet Newsletter about Crisis Management

© 2006 Jonathan Bernstein
Circulation: 4,000+
Estimated Readership: 14,000+


The Internet provides many would-be Davids with ready-made slingshots

Jonathan Bernstein


The Real Thing? The Rising Power of NGOÕs
Coke & PepsiÕs India Adventures Mark a New Generation in Defending Brands
By Richard S. Levick

Coca-Cola and Pepsi sit together atop a market of great potential in India as that nationÕs populace sips its way through 355 million cases of beverage each year. The cola giants - true to their status as world-leading brands - share 90% of IndiaÕs soda market, dominating the demand for soft drink in this land of Bollywood blockbusters, dire poverty, and superpower ambitions.

Yet India has given entirely new meaning to the term "cola war." It is an ongoing war that persuaded two of the fiercest rivals in the history of commerce to stage a separate peace. The real adversary is not a competing brand, but separate political force that, in some senses, opposes all brands. In some ways, the non-governmental organizations -- NGOs -- that played the decisive role in Coke and PepsiÕs India fracas distrust the global economy as a whole.

Attack the global marketÕs leading brands, and you attack the market itself. ItÕs a war of attrition likely to last as long as capitalism, with new found powers in the age of the Internet.

India, the worldÕs largest democracy, has an economy that is now booming with a growth rate of 8% per year and foreign investments of $8.4 billion last year. Coke and Pepsi themselves have invested nearly $2 billion in India over the years, money that their boards no doubt thought was well spent. Imagine their shock when an Indian environmental group leaked a report alleging the soft drinks were unfit for human consumption.

The health scare was surreal as farmers emptied cola bottles into their fields. There had already been earlier instances, before the environmental group leaked the report, of farmers using the worldÕs most valuable brand and its rival as pesticides. Now, one popular TV personage was regularly telling his cable-TV audience to use the colas only as "toilet cleaners."

What went wrong in India can easily go wrong elsewhere as new players - namely NGOÕs - exert ever more influence in markets around the world. India offers a crash course for facing down the challenges of NGOs and maintaining a global momentum that no corporation can afford to relinquish.

Toxic Cocktails

The soda kingsÕ troubles began in earnest this past August, when the Centre for Science and Environment - or CSE - released a report on the results of a lab study that allegedly found 57 bottles of Coke and Pepsi products from 12 Indian states to contain unsafe levels of pesticides, including a "cocktail of 3-5 pesticides" in all samples.

These levels allegedly exceeded by 24 times proposed environmental regulations that are still being formalized. WhatÕs more, the report came three years after another CSE study found higher-than-allowable pesticide levels in Coke and Pepsi soft drinks, although the Minister of Health issued a statement saying that the conclusions were not warranted by the tests that CSE had done.

Coke and Pepsi are to be commended for their willingness to confront the issue directly and, in so doing, provide a fundamentally salutary example for other companies. Coca-Cola, for example, had its products tested by one of the worldÕs most respected laboratories, the Central Science Laboratory, an Executive Agency of the UK Government Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs. Test reports detected no residues of the four pesticides allegedly found in the products by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE).

However, Coke and Pepsi made an unfortunate timing error. CSEÕs accusations had already fired the public imagination and the crisis swept the nation. Subsequent attacks, far from quelled, were unrelenting and ferocious, in some cases led by publicly hostile local bureaucrats. Members of the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party called for a nationwide ban, as outraged activists staged mock funerals that focused on "tainted" colas.

Problems grew from there. Seven of IndiaÕs states refused to lift partial bans on the drinks. One state, Kerala, a left-leaning state government in the south, has totally banned the production and sale of the drinks (a ban which the Kerala High Court would rule against just a month later). Environmentalists are still planning nationwide protests.

No doubt, CSE had succeeded in part because it is viewed as being credible and is considered a well-respected voice in the marketplace of ideas. Just last year it won a $150,000 Stockholm Water Prize presented by King Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden for its research and advocacy in rainwater harvesting. CSE had also campaigned successfully against air pollution in the 1990s, finally getting Delhi buses, taxis, and "autorickshaws" to use compressed natural gas.

Coke and PepsiÕs troubles illustrate the problem of doing business in an argumentative grassroots democracy, where controversy can spell trouble for big brands and where multinational corporations are victimized by easily slighted nationalism. NGOs may have credibility in the United States, but here - in a nation that counts a socialist like Nehru among its revered founders, and where governments like KeralaÕs are strongly entrenched - they enjoy a particularly emphatic legitimacy.

The "Other" Governments

The cola companies first resorted to textbook communications plans, commissioning independent lab tests and working out coordinated public relations responses. So far, so good, but their public response was bogged down in technicalities, waiting for the lab results before aggressively addressing accusations. The delay fanned the flames of suspicion.

Many NGOs, including small ones, have proven that their own brands have all the cachet and global reach of multinational corporations. Some NGOs are critical players in national development, often channeling individual, institutional, and government funding to communities. Others see their mission as hunting down corporate malfeasance, most often non-Indian corporations.

According to Joseph Nye, dean of the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, many NGOs claim to act as a "global conscience," representing broad public interests beyond the purview of individual states. While they may not wield the "hard power" of government, they can still coerce by persuasion rather than compulsion.

Some NGOs make the world more democratic, while others act irresponsibly and with little accountability, Nye adds.

Good or bad, NGOs are a fact of life and companies must strategize accordingly.

What the Major Media Missed

There are many types of NGOs - consultancy or research organizations, training or capacity building groups, grassroots organizations, city-based organizations that restrict their focus to cities, national and international organizations, self-help groups, and religious NGOs. Although chartered as Not for Profit, they can still turn a profit.

The rise of the NGO - particularly in India - is a story the major media seem to have missed. estimates there are 1.5 million NGOs at work in India, some 55,000 registered in Bombay alone, including places of worship, sports associations, hospitals, and educational institutions. The Society for Participatory Research in Asia estimates 19.4 million people work in IndiaÕs NGO sector, many of them volunteers.

For every corporation doing business in India, thereÕs an NGO to match. NGOs seemingly know how to cut conglomerates down to size by captivating the public imagination with stories that reach the "Indian heart." They bear witness to an intrinsic truth - the truth behind every sensational headline - that a news item is first and foremost a story.

The best news stories, those that go national and last for days or months on end, contain three basic elements: a victim, a villain, and a vindicator. ItÕs easy to see that CSE painted the cola kings as villains, Indian consumers as victims, and itself as vindicator. They know the law of KISS - "Keeping it Simple, Stupid."

The cola wars underscore their strategies to a tee. CSEÕs prior study found pesticide residues in bottled water brands sold in India and in everything from milk and baby milk powder to honey, fruit jam, and fresh fruit. But milk and bottlers almost certainly would have made for lousy national villains. TheyÕre too small, and big stories demand big villains.

Not just Coke and Pepsi, other multinationals have gotten caught in the crosshairs of IndiaÕs "other government." Fast-food chain KFC was reduced to a single restaurant three years ago after Bangalore farmers ransacked a restaurant and accused the company of selling chickens tainted with carcinogens. (KFC has since made a comeback with a menu tailored for a vegetarian culture. It will soon have 30 outlets in India.)

Fighting Back

Coke and Pepsi were armed with an unprecedented resolve to work with each other. They were both ready to fight. They were both ready to be responsive, and the fact patterns were on their side. They had even started the ball rolling with a colorful and persuasive metaphor. Then came the crucial delay, the loss of momentum, and the proliferation of inimical messages nationwide and Internet-wide.

Central Science Laboratory had a national press conference announcing the results of their tests on August 14 attracting more than 100 journalists - a strong response, but one that occurred nearly two weeks after the CSE pushed their story into the mainstream. The Cola companies acted forcefully and with speed, but not as fast as the proactive NGOs. For large companies, acting as rapidly as their own internal decision making and uncovering of the facts will allow, often puts them at a disadvantage in the media.

Run Toward A Crisis, Rather Than From It

The earlier one meets a crisis head-on, the better. When the cola crisis began, Coke referred journalists to supportive blogs and the phone numbers of interest groups, including the Centre for Sanity and Balance in Public Life, whose message points were widely quoted: "What is all the fuss about? Yes colas have pesticides [but] the amount is so low compared to other things Indians consume that they can be ignored."

The message may have been substantively accurate but it was interpreted to mean, "DonÕt worry. Just be happy." It was an unfair interpretation by the media, but it was one repeated frequently.

A pro-company blog strategy is as essential as it is brilliant. But for it to be effective as an echo chamber, there must be a central controlling voice. The beverage companies - or any companies under attack - need to provide that initial voice. The blogs and third parties will then provide the reverberations that form public opinion. They cannot be left on their own to do it or you will lose control. Unfortunately, in the early days of this crisis, the cola companies, while highly active, were fairly quiet publicly.

Running toward a crisis means confronting the other sideÕs ostensible messages head-on, but without legitimizing them.

Publish Passionate Pictures

Controversial business stories are ultimately battles involving visuals. Some pictures are worth a thousand words; others millions. While the cola kings did many things right in responding to this crisis, including print ads and commercials which focused on pictures and emotions -- they lost time at the outset of the story, when emotional opinions were being formed.

Pepsi, in particular, allowed a propitious moment to pass when it had the ultimate weapon at hand - its own freshly minted CEO, Indra Nooyi, a woman as comfortable in a sari as in a business suit. Born and raised in India, Nooyi is 28th on this yearÕs Forbes list of the worldÕs most powerful women in industry. She has maintained close ties over the years with Indian government officials and visited the country frequently to grow PepsiÕs market share.

WhatÕs more, she is regarded as a "people person," a plainspoken executive who isnÕt above singing pop tunes and who has merged her Hindu faith with the lifestyle of a busy CEO.

The Indian public no doubt would have been fascinated and maybe won over by visuals of her chatting with farmers, hip urban shoppers, Bollywood starlets, and leading bureaucrats. Pepsi could have flown its CEO to India for photo ops of her in flowing sari drinking Pepsi with farmers or, better yet, children.

In the search for great visuals, corporations neednÕt counter-attack NGOs and should, in fact, resist that temptation. If the pictures are good enough, the high ground is the best place to be. Banal photos, the kind corporations often use in their day-to-day marketing, sometimes work, but usually do not.

In crisis, the goal is pictures that communicate both compassion and urgency. In other words, capture the collective imagination.

Perception Always Trumps Reality

Truth is in the eyes of the perceiver even when the "facts" have no basis in reality. Truth is determined by who tells the story and how soon they tell it. Perceived truth may actually be inversely proportionate to the volume of detail presented by one or the other side.

As weÕve seen, CSE came out with the reputed facts first: pesticide residues in Coke and Pepsi are up to 24 times the acceptable standards found in the West. Perception is always guided by the first message we hear. The defense can win, but not by simply battling the facts.

Adverse and inaccurate messages must be boxed out, which is done by introducing new messages into as many news sources as possible, thereby isolating the residual negative reports. Hostile reporters must be identified and contacted on a one-on-one basis to ferret out their individual concerns. Opinion leaders must begin to articulate your position. New messages must be substituted in place of the original reports.

CSEÕs lab tests were called into question in tests commissioned by Coke and Pepsi and even by the Minister of Health. But the damage had already been done. Coke and Pepsi were forced to react - to be in the near-impossible situation of having to disprove a negative.

When YouÕre Explaining, YouÕre Losing

Coke and Pepsi executives in India knew consumers would be easily confused, because the subject of pesticides in groundwater and soil is technical and difficult to explain. But explain they did, or tried, for the handfuls of people who cared.

By its very nature, the act of explaining is reactive and reaction is always an uphill battle. Human nature determines that an accepted fact cannot be supplanted by argument; only by another, equally prepossessing fact. Indeed, the best practices of crisis management are interlinked. Indra Nooyi talking to children and drinking cola does not explain or argue. It generates a wholly separate fact in the mindÕs eye, and itÕs only that fact, or equally simple ones like it, that could have won the day in India before the tipping point - the moment when the momentum of evolving news stories take on a life of its own - occurred.

CSE has a staff of 100; Coke and Pepsi employ 12,500 people in India directly and support more than 200,000 indirectly by virtue of purchases of India-made sugar, packaging material, and shipping services.

In the end, however, IndiaÕs new cola war has little to do with cola itself. The story here is the rise of NGOs, especially in developing markets like India. Many activists feel this is the most direct and economical way they can take a shot at a global marketplace that they believe threatens and overwhelms them, and to which they are instinctively hostile. Take a shot at the leading brands in that marketplace and they will rise to the national and potentially global stage.

One billion consumers in India are still at play. Even more important, the Coke and Pepsi crisis is a template for NGOs everywhere to do battle and win -- or at least temporarily wound -- given corporate vulnerabilities that need only be alleged, not proven.

Richard S. Levick, Esq., President and CEO of Levick Strategic Communications, protects brands and reputations during the highest-stakes global crises and litigation. Find a comprehensive arsenal of vital communications tools at, including books, newsletters, and helpful articles.

Editor's Note: Thank you to reader Karen Henen-Davis of Dow Corning in the UK for calling this item to our attention

UK Businesses More Proactive About Apologies

A report by the communications agency Weber Shandwick shows that businesses in the UK are more likely to offer a public apology in times of crisis and are less likely to 'run for cover' than those in other parts of the world. The survey of 950 global companies in 11 countries found that almost 65% of UK CEOs and chairmen, said they would 'usually or always' consider a public apology to help their firm recover its reputation compared with 57% in other parts of Europe and North America.

In the UK, 14% of the respondents considered it important to keep the CEO out of the media compared with an average of 20% in the ten other countries surveyed.

Editor's note: An organization called ICOR has a very interesting big-picture approach to the field of crisis management, all captured in their concept of "resilience." Here's a short piece about it, and I encourage you to visit their website for more information.

Building Resilient Communities

Communities are comprised of many types of organizations - each supporting or contributing to the health and resiliency of that community.

In order for the community as a whole to be resilient, each one of the organizations within that community needs to be able to provide their particular goods and / or services - no matter what challenges the world puts before them.

It is important to take a systems view of organizations, recognizing there are multiple interdependencies within and between different organizations that influence their ability to respond and recover. Effective resilience management for any one organization must look beyond that single organization and consider the resilience of other organizations that it depends on.

Resilience is not something that can be achieved by any one organization or infrastructure system acting in isolation. Organizations are required to work together toward system resilience in order to build resilient communities.

To learn more about making your organization more resilient and for the latest in resiliency research, go to or


The 4th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM 2007) will be held May 13-16, 2007 in Delft, The Netherlands. The ISCRAM community includes researchers and practitioners active in the field of crisis management.

This year's theme is Intelligent Human Computer Systems for Crisis Response and Management and will offer 27 special sessions grouped in the following themes:

Theme 1: Disaster Management & Internationalization

Theme 2: Real World Research Methods

Theme 3: Human computer interaction

Theme 4: Geographic Information Systems

Theme 5: System & Software Development

Theme 6: Systems & Organization

Theme 7: Training & Simulation

Both scholars and practitioners are invited to submit papers and demonstrations. Submission deadline is January 15, 2007. Complete information is available at

The Big Story Will Still Appear Mid-December

For those who have been reading my promises of a major news story that I was going to break in this ezine, my client and I have had good fortune beyond our wildest expectations. I was able to get a very prominent national news organization interested in this matter even before it is published, and that organization has the exclusive first right to break the story. You will be alerted of the air date as soon as it is absolutely confirmed -- i.e., they start running some promos. Then, I will publish a special edition of this ezine and launch a related website. As promised, all readers will have the opportunity to help resolve this crisis situation, should you choose to do so!


Keeping The Wolves At Bay

Keeping the Wolves at Bay (available in print and PDF formats) remains, to my knowledge, the only commercially published media training manual in the world. It can be purchased at, and its pages can be modified to make it YOUR "name brand" media training manual if you are an agency or organization that frequently conducts training. If the latter subject is of interest to you, write to:

Have Webcam And Videoconferencing, Will Consult
An Offer from Jonathan Bernstein

Would you like to bring me to your next staff or board meeting, virtually, to conduct some training on crisis preparedness, crisis response, or "just" to give a good solid orientation on the subject of crisis management? There's a great value to "face time," but sometimes the cost and time required for travel make it impossible. If you or your IT department can allow a webcam stream into your computer (and better yet if you can send one back), we don't need no stinkin' high-tech, we can do this lower tech. I am constantly trying to bring more affordable services to clients who may not have the budget for other options, so this is an experiment. I have a webcam and am happy to bill by the hour for short-term consulting if this option is of interest. There is also a videoconferencing facility very close to my office if you would like to use that instead. Call 626-825-3838 or write to

What Does That Slogan Mean?

By popular demand, I have re-opened an online store at which I sell clothing and mugs featuring the famous "Crisis Manager University" emblem and its infamous slogan, "Quoniam Stercus Accidit". That translates to "Because Stuff Happens." Except the real word isn't "stuff." There's only a 10% markup at the store to cover my costs -- it's a turnkey operation hosted by Cafe Press. I have found the items there to be a major hit with my clients and associates and great gift for any crisis manager. My purpose is to share my sense of humor with like (sick) minds as well as to prompt some folks to ask, "Who came up with this idea?" You can visit the store at


Bernstein Crisis Management, Inc. has formal or informal co-promotional and mutually beneficial business associations with a number of the services we mention periodically in this newsletter. No, we can't go into details because that's confidential, proprietary, etc. But our relationship is NOT "arm's distance" and you should know that, since we regularly write about these services as we use them for crisis and issues management or other purposes. That said, you should also know that Bernstein Crisis Management sought the relationships because its staff is convinced that these services are the best of their kind for Bernstein Crisis Management's needs and those of its clients. If you have any questions about these relationships, please contact Jonathan Bernstein, (626) 825-3838.


Jonathan Bernstein is president of Bernstein Crisis Management, Inc.,, a national crisis management public relations agency providing 24/7 access to crisis response professionals. The agency engages in the full spectrum of crisis management services: crisis prevention, response, planning & training. He has been in the public relations field since 1982, following five-year stints in both military intelligence and investigative reporting. Write to


GUEST AUTHORS are very welcome to submit material for "Crisis Manager." There is no fee paid, but most guest authors have reported receiving business inquiries as a result of appearing in this publication. Case histories, experience-based lessons, commentary on current news events and editorial opinion are all eligible for consideration. Submission is not a guarantee of acceptance.


When I find a site that I think will be useful to my readers or site visitors, I put it on our Links page. If you have a site that would be of specific use to crisis managers and want to discuss a link exchange or other cooperative effort, please write to me,


All information contained herein is obtained by Jonathan Bernstein from sources believed by Jonathan Bernstein to be accurate and reliable.

Because of the possibility of human and mechanical error as well as other factors, neither Jonathan Bernstein nor Bernstein Crisis Management is responsible for any errors or omissions. All information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Bernstein Crisis Management and Jonathan Bernstein make no representations and disclaim all express, implied, and statutory warranties of any kind to the user and/or any third party including, without limitation, warranties as to accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability, or fitness for any particular purpose.

Unless due to willful tortuous misconduct or gross negligence, Jonathan Bernstein and Bernstein Crisis Management shall have no liability in tort, contract, or otherwise (and as permitted by law, product liability), to the user and/or any third party.

Under no circumstance shall Bernstein Crisis Management or Jonathan Bernstein be liable to the user and/or any third party for any lost profits or lost opportunity, indirect, special, consequential, incidental, or punitive damages whatsoever, even if Bernstein Crisis Management or Jonathan Bernstein has been advised of the possibility of such damages.

A service of this newsletter is to provide news summaries and/or snippets to readers. In such instances articles and/or snippets will be reprinted as they are received from the originating party or as they are displayed on the originating website or in the original article. As we do not write the news, we merely point readers to it, under no circumstance shall Bernstein Crisis Management or Jonathan Bernstein be liable to the user and/or any third party for any lost profits or lost opportunity, indirect, special, consequential, incidental, or punitive damages whatsoever due to the distribution of said news articles or snippets that lead readers to a full article on a news service's website, even if Bernstein Crisis Management or Jonathan Bernstein has been advised of the possibility of such damages. Authors of the original news story and their publications shall be exclusively held liable. Any corrections to news stories are not mandatory and shall be printed at the discretion of the list moderator after evaluation on a case-by-case basis.


Do you know people who are Crisis Managers, whether they want to be or not? Please pass this newsletter on to them!

Subscribe to the free, twice-monthly email newsletter below. After entering your email address, you will receive a message asking you to confirm your subscription in order to prevent someone else from adding you to the list without permission. YOU MUST CONFIRM YOUR SUBSCRIPTION OR YOU WILL NOT RECEIVE THE NEWSLETTER.

Subscribe to the BCM Crisis Manager newsletter

Articles in "Crisis Manager" were, unless otherwise noted, written and copyrighted by Jonathan Bernstein. Permission to reprint will often be granted for no charge. Write to